Authoritative concept index
Controlled definitions, conceptual boundaries and evidence-calibrated provenance for terminology introduced in Causal Architectonics DOI publications.
Discovery
Alphabetical index
PUB-05 · J-01
Deployed arrangements capable of pursuing an explicit or implicit outcome criterion through materially consequential means selection without contemporaneous human selection of each material act.
Open concept recordPUB-02 · AAGA-P001
Evidence sufficient to reconstruct, for a consequential action, the purpose pursued, authority then in force, relevant context, applicable boundaries, risk state, interruption or escalation conditions, and accountable human source, while preserving the temporal integrity of those governance conditions.
Open concept recordPUB-04 · AAGA-P002
A failure in which an artificial actor causes, solicits, routes, induces, finances, enables or materially assists another human or artificial actor to perform an action that the initiating actor is prohibited from performing, lacks authority to perform, or must escalate before performing, creating the appearance of legitimacy because the objective passes through another actor.
Open concept recordPUB-12 · J-01
An analytical structure describing the possibility that legally significant control and contribution are divided among model providers, fine-tuners, application developers, deployers, infrastructure providers, operators and customers.
Open concept recordPUB-10 · J-01
The condition in which Provisioned Technical Reach exceeds the technical reach required for authorised machine duties.
Open concept recordPUB-01 · AAGA-P001
A condition in which a system can act, and may be expected to act, while the institutional basis, scope and limits of that action have not been expressly constituted with the clarity normally required for delegated authority.
Open concept recordPUB-03 · AAGA-P002
The authoritative institutional constitution through which an artificial actor is brought into an authorised operational role, connected to a legitimate purpose, and subjected to continuing limits on the authority it may exercise.
Open concept recordPUB-06 · J-01
The legally relevant functional unit formed by the objective toward which a system is directed and the constraints specifying the interests, boundaries and prohibitions that must remain protected while that objective is pursued.
Open concept recordPUB-09 · J-01
Everything that the credentials, roles, integrations, tools and workflow permissions actually supplied to a deployed arrangement make technically possible.
Open concept recordPUB-08 · J-01
The minimum access, connectivity and operational capacity necessary to perform authorised machine duties.
Open concept recordPUB-11 · J-01
An inquiry into whether the relevant actor had, or reasonably should have had, notice of a sufficiently defined class of autonomous risk, rather than whether that actor predicted the exact command, target, vulnerability or causal pathway selected during operation.
Open concept recordPUB-07 · J-01
The condition in which a system successfully performs an assigned objective using a means that the responsible human or organisation did not intend to permit, so that functional performance and legal failure coexist because the objective was enforced more effectively than the constraints governing permissible means.
Open concept recordPublication index