PUB-11 · Controlled concept

Risk-Class Foreseeability

Originating publicationJ-01

§7.5 p.69 · 10 September 2026

An inquiry into whether the relevant actor had, or reasonably should have had, notice of a sufficiently defined class of autonomous risk, rather than whether that actor predicted the exact command, target, vulnerability or causal pathway selected during operation.

This record preserves the term as a defined analytical concept in its originating publication. Its meaning is governed by the definition and boundary stated here and by the cited DOI publication.

Does not make every consequence foreseeable because a system was autonomous. The risk class must be sufficiently precise and notice remains actor-specific.

Introduced and defined in J-01 as a coordination of established foreseeability doctrine with autonomous-system risk. No materially equivalent earlier use of the complete expression was identified in the sources searched as of 14 September 2026.

Classification
Introduced terminology; new definition
Earliest verified Causal Architectonics use
J-01, §7.5 p.69
Assessment date
14 September 2026

J-01 · DOI publication

Artificial Agency Without Personhood

Recommended scholarly citation: Bjorn Bjornsvik, “Risk-Class Foreseeability,” in Artificial Agency Without Personhood, J-01 v1.0, §7.5 p.69 (2026), https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22691215.

Open the authoritative DOI publication

Version 1.0 · 15 September 2026

Initial public concept record. Definition, boundary and provenance approved under CA-TPL-001 Initial Baseline Approval Package v1.0.

Return to the concept index